Monday, January 28, 2008

Comprehending the Veil

“So…what’s up with that veil thing?”


This question comes up a lot for me, and I don’t even wear a veil. I can’t even imagine how often it must come up for Muslim women who wear one when they are talking with non-Muslims who are befuddled by the piece of cloth. In general, the Islamic veil is known by a simple and encompassing term: hijab. Hijab comes from the Arabic word meaning to cover, screen, or shelter. The word for eyebrow, hawajib, even comes from the same root as they serve to shelter the eye. Forms of Hijab come in very different shapes and sizes, colors and fashions and vary between countries, classes, age groups, and personal preference. As a tip for anyone who is ever unsure of what to call the Islamic headscarf, hijab is generally the go-to-word. Anything more specific leaves room for mistakes, as sometimes it is hard to keep a niqab from a burqah from a chic veil. If you are curious, the niqab is when a woman’s face is covered except for her eyes (often a detachable square piece of cloth over the nose which is secured on the veil around the face) And, most importantly, a burqah is NOT any old veil. Burqahs are the fully covering head piece which were made famous by Afghani women (largely not by their choice) in which their eyes and face are covered by a mesh-like fabric. Again, if you are already feeling a bit shaky about the terms, remember that you can’t go wrong with using "veil" or “hijab”.
So why the hijab?

An easy answer that many Muslims might give is that they believe that God commanded women to cover all but their face and hands. But this begs the question, why? And of course those Muslims have also asked this question, and while there are different interpretations, a common one seems to be that the hijab promotes respect between men and women. This is because within Islamic tradition, hijab is not just the veil or whatever head covering a woman wears. It also encompasses the idea of modesty, of respect; the idea that a woman should be treated as a person, and not as a sex object. Men of society should interact with women as peers, intellectual equals, and not be distracted by immodest, inappropriate attire. As interpreted by many Muslims, God in his ultimate wisdom, has commanded women to take it upon themselves to prevent such a scenario, and cover themselves. But men aren’t off the hook, as it has also been commanded that they avert their eyes and treat women with the respect that they deserve. Before you get thrown, remember that many different cultures and religions have different definitions of what is appropriate and what is not. In parts of the world, there is nothing wrong with a woman bearing her breasts. In Kansas, there is certainly something inappropriate about it. And likewise, in Islam, many have interpreted hair to be inappropriate for public. If you find yourself unable to make this leap of logic, just remember how puzzled a Polynesian might be at the seemingly oppressive bra and shirt that American women wear, gasp, and by choice!

Now, even understanding the different standards of modesty,you still might ask, doesn’t this somehow put the burden on women? Sure, God commanded men to also avert their eyes, but if God also commands women to cover themselves, doesn’t that some how imply that ultimately men can’t help themselves? Why is it that women should have to take the extra step to cover themselves just because guys can’t somehow control their sexual urges? It’s not my fault my boss is a caveman and can’t take me seriously, I shouldn’t have to compensate for his weakness!

I used to feel this way. I was able to understand the reasoning behind the hijab (I think every girl can when she walks down the street and is made to feel degraded and humiliated by the cat-calls of a disrespectful man) but I still felt frustrated that the onus of the responsibility seemed to fall on the woman. But then I remembered that this is not only true of Islamic tradition, but of American society as well. One such example, a classic, which shows the unequal expectations for controlling sex drives takes place at a college frat party. No girl, in her right mind, would ever let her drunken girlfriend be alone in a room full of drunk frat guys for the night. Reverse the roles, and see how comfortable a guy would feel in a room of girls. Of course its not fair, but its not about fairness. It’s about being smart. Girls have these rules about watching out for each other, and for themselves, because no matter how you would hope guys to act in a perfect world, you don’t risk rape or sexual assault for the quixotic dream of gender equality.

So even in America, where we like to claim gender equality, you can find examples of girls taking on extra responsibilities to preempt ugly scenarios. Its not that you are some how condoning the weakness of guys; by avoiding the roomful of 30 drunken frat boys you aren’t somehow saying that sexual assault is okay. You are just taken a precaution in the same way that when a Muslim woman dons a hijab to avoid being treated like a piece of meat by her boss she isn’t excusing that disrespectful behavior.

Is this the only reason that women wear the hijab?

Of course not. There are thousands of reasons and explanations that women (and social scientists) give for the veil.* For some they are simply trying to be good Muslims in their daily life, for others they might see it as a political symbol of resistance or affiliation with Islamic reform movements who oppose the corruption and dictatorship of various secular regimes. Some might also see the veil as a rejection of Western imperialism, of American hegemony and globalization which has stripped them of their own culture. This is summed up in a quote by Adil Hussein, a late leader of the Egyptian Labor Party.



"Why can't we not only have a dress that is modest, but also have one which we have created in the region, like the Indian sari? Why can't we have our own dress which expresses decency, a requirement of Islam, as well as the special beauty that would be a mark of our society which has excelled in the arts and civilization?"


Of course there are still other explanations that believe that the use of the veil has a functional explanation such as lowering cost of attire (and hair salons) or shortens the time and energy a woman uses to beautify herself. And finally, never underestimate the power of social pressure, family pressure, and good ol peer pressure in determining what women wear. Once enough of your Muslim peers begin to don the veil, you might feel like you stick out a bit if you don't. Or maybe you've heard that the young men are only interested in marrying a veiled woman. But, I think it is important to remember, that Muslim women tend to be vehemently proud of the fact that it was a personal choice to wear the veil. Often they find it frustrating that women in the West have the freedom to wear skimpy clothes, but judge other women for wearing more.

Most veiled women just wish that Westerners would just hurry up and get over the whole veil thing. Read up on it, learn about it, and then see past it. Lets leave it up to 4th graders to judge people for what they wear or don't wear.




*Inspiration for this passage came from Saba Mahmood's article "Feminist Theory, Embodiment and the Docile Agent: Some Relections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival."2001. Cultural Anthropology, 6(2):202-236.

7 comments:

Kingson Man said...

brilliant thoughts Pauline!

I agree most strongly with the cultural interpretation of the Hijab. It's a garment that seems very alien to westerners: somewhat uncomfortable, excessive, stifling. But I think some women wear it for this reason exactly, to signify difference from what she perceives to be an aggressive and adversarial West, to demonstrate solidarity with her own traditions and enfranchisement within her own culture. I'd say that, for the better-educated Muslim women who are aware of Western viewpoints, it's a proud and defiant sign of difference.

That said, I find it totally silly for a woman to wear a Hijab in order to avoid being seen as a sex object. What better expresses a woman's total fixation on sex than the donning of a burqa? It can conversely be called a fixation on avoiding sex, but that's semantics. This head-to-toe coverage in black veil seems as much a paranoid overreaction as Howard Hughes' germophobic holing up in a hotel room in all-white garments towards the end of his life. Claiming freedom from the oppressive gaze of horny men, she imprisons herself in opaque formless cloth. Her burqa, if anything, cements her in the role of a sex object, perpetually running in place to escape being a sex object.

Sometimes, beyond the need for treading lightly around other people's cultures, stupid and uncivilized practices have to be called out as such. For most women most of the time, these garments serve the purpose they were designed for: to immobilize women.

plucylew said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
plucylew said...

Thanks for the well thought out comments and honest opinion Mr. K Money. I'm always appreciative when people have clearly thought about what I have written.

But to turn the tables again, I might ask that you think about the possibility that no matter what a woman wears, whether it be a mini skirt or the hijab, aren't some men going to consider her a sex object? If by donning the burqah, as you mentioned, she is somehow fixing herself to be considered a sex object, what sort of message does a tube top and tight jeans send? Of course this goes back to the whole issue of no matter what a woman wears, whether it is a veil or a mini skirt, it is going to be up to the men of our society to change how they think about women. Women can make a difference of course, largely in how they raise their sons and daughters, but ultimately its not about what she wears. Its about how he thinks. Given that, I think every woman has the right to wear what she wants to, whether it be the mini skirt or the niqab, in order to feel the most at ease and respected.

Regarding immobility of women who wear the hijab, I might ask what you mean by "those garments?"In terms of whether or not they immobilize women, I think its important to differentiate between how a burqah and a simple head scarf might affect the mobility of a woman. The former might severely limit it, the latter could produce little change. Veiled women play sports, swim, and have successful careers as dentists, surgeons and chemists. I think that for whatever reason, Westerners tend to focus on the burqah and the niqab as the rule and therefore focus on whatever immobility might be produced from such garments, where in fact they are the exception. Why is the burqah the focus when the vast majority of both Islamic scholars and veiled women agree that covering the face is not religiously based and is not a correct interpretation of Islamic law? So when we talk about mobility, lets be specific. And when we talk about burqahs, lets remember that they are a minority opinion in the population of veiled women. And in a democracy, don't we cringe at minority rule?

Kingson Man said...

PLL,

I agree that tubetops and miniskirts are obscenely fixated on sex, but Britney Spears knows exactly what she is doing whereas fundamentalist Muslims are only kidding themselves. Now I don't think it is a problem for a man's eyes to pop out of his head and his tongue to roll onto the ground when in thrall to a beautiful woman. Nor is it a problem that women trip over themselves in trying to target the richest and most powerful man in a room. It's hard-wired. These are strategies that work.

But I reveal my ignorance when I use burqa and hijab interchangeably; thanks for edumacating me. But I still believe that "these garments" in general serve the same function of reducing the effectiveness of women in the public sphere. This is what I mean by immobility - it is true that berobed women can be dentists, play sports, and look into microscopes in the chemistry lab. But they do all these tasks in spite of, rather than irrespective of, their coverings. The ridiculous image I have in mind is a burqa'd woman hiking up her robe a bit to kick a soccer ball around. Sure, women can circumvent the limitations of their garments. But even a relatively uncumbersome headscarf is a symbol of immobilization. Women's hair is sexy; a headscarf prevents that sexiness from sullying the public sphere. A sportsbra and shorts would be functional clothing for playing soccer but that would be unthinkable. Public decency takes precedence over functionality and effectiveness. A man getting his cavity removed by a female dentist musn't suffer the indignity of being turned on by her luscious curls of chestnut hair, shining like the date palms on a moonlit desert night.

The surface discussion of garments reveals the ugly current of misogyny that motivates so much of Islam as it is practiced today, irrespective of the subtle and nuanced positions of scripture. Please don't tell me you don't grimace when you see a bunch of black-sheeted ghosts scurrying around the streets. This kind of fundamentalism denies a woman her public personality - but only for her own good, of course.

Kingson Man said...

btw it's -20 wind chill and we're going to get 6 inches of snow today...any accumulation up in Cairo?

mrb said...

Y'all are so wise and funny and very interesting. So the Hijab is a Bad Hat day? Reverse this whole discussion as if men were doing all this dressing stuff, with no change in anatomy but women had control of the wealth. Think about Music Row Circle. Aren't we all just about ourselves if we have on our Birthday Suits?

Love you and miss you.

Liz said...

It's so true what you wrote about there still being gender inequality in the US and elsewhere, not just the Islamic world... sigh.